← Back to work
C3Pay · Money Transfer

Getting more people to send money home.

The money transfer screen was the app's front door — and its biggest leak. I rebuilt it, and made it the #1 way people start a transfer.

Role
Product Designer
Team
1 PM · 2 Eng · Analytics
Users
2.8 million
Shipped
July 2025
The money transfer screen, before and after the redesign
The money transfer screen — before, and after the redesign.
What is C3Pay?

C3Pay is a salary card and app by Edenred, used by 2.8 million blue-collar workers across the UAE — construction workers, drivers, cleaners, delivery riders.

For most of them, this card is their only bank account. They get paid on it, and they use it to send money home to their families in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, the Philippines, and Sri Lanka.

That last part — money transfer — is the most important, most emotional thing the app does. And it's what this case study is about.

💳
The product
A salary card + app
👷
The users
2.8M blue-collar workers in the UAE
🌍
The job to be done
Send money home
📱
The reality
Basic English, low-end phones, high stakes
+5.2%
more people started a transfer
+12K
extra senders / month
#1
went from worst to best entry point
100%
yearly goal hit
The goal

Get more people who open the money transfer screen to actually send.

The target for the year was to grow money transfer usage from 14.1% to 14.5%. My job: turn the dashboard card — the biggest thing on screen — into a real entry point. Before touching pixels, I went to the data.

1Dig into the data

The numbers pointed straight at the first tap.

Of everyone who opened the money transfer screen, fewer than half carried on to send.

There were three ways into money transfer — and the dashboard card, the biggest thing on screen, was the least used of all three.

Three funnel charts comparing entry points: Bottom nav, Mid nav, and Dashboard card
In short — The biggest button on screen was doing the least work. But the data couldn't tell me why.
2UNDERSTAND USERS PAINPOINTS

So I watched 8 real users use the old screen.

Users from India, Pakistan, and Nepal — basic English, low-end phones. The data showed where people dropped. Watching them showed why.

The AED 17 was meant to say "we're cheaper." Users thought we were charging it.

— From problem-discovery testing · 8 users

They also struggled with mixed fee messages, and — for returning users — a screen so bare there was no reason to come back.

In short — The data showed where. The 8 users showed why.
3Now the problem is clear

Three problems, found — not assumed.

I didn't start with a problem statement. I found it by following the data and watching users.

Problem 1 — Confusing fees

New users saw mixed messages — "free" here, a charge there.

Problem 2 — A scary number

An "AED 17" comparison meant to show we're cheaper — but people thought we were charging it.

Problem 3 — A boring repeat screen

Returning users got just a box and a button. No reason to come back.

The old dashboard design, annotated — first-time user and repeat user states
In short — I didn't start with the problem — I found it by following the data and the users.
4Study rivals & group users

I looked at what already works — and who I'm designing for.

I studied apps our users already love — remittance apps (TapTap, IME) and delivery apps.

What I learned
Rate up front
Lead with the rate and "0 fees."
Bold banners
Big and punchy, not quiet.
Trust signals
"90+ banks," logos, proof.
Speed sells
"Money in 2 minutes."
Competitor scan — a grid of dozens of remittance and delivery app screens

One card can't talk to everyone. So I grouped users by how active they are and which country they send to.

User segmentation matrix — new users vs. users who have done a money transfer, across six countries
In short — Borrow what works, and speak to each user by group.
5Design the fix

I built it in four phases, not one big leap.

A screen this important is risky to change all at once. So I shipped it piece by piece.

Phase 1 — Cut the clutter
Remove the confusing fee comparison.
Phase 2 — Show the value
Live rate + "0 Fees" up top.
Phase 3 — Add trust & warmth
Country image, "90+ banks."
Phase 4 — Faster for regulars
Jump to a saved person.
Sketches, wireframes and final frames in sequence

The hard call

Option A — Native-language cards

Most heartfelt — greet a Hindi sender in Hindi. But India alone has many languages. High effort, unclear payoff.

✓ What I chose — Ship the sure wins first

Clear rate, 0 fees, one button. Save the language idea for later.

Impact/effort matrix — 2x2 with sticky notes
In short — Knowing what not to build was just as important as the design.
6Validate with 10 users

Before shipping, I tested the finished design.

A second round — 10 users across India, Pakistan, and Nepal — this time on the new design, to check it actually worked.

Delights
  • "Much easier now." Cleaner, faster to read.
  • Understood "free" right away.
Surprises
  • Fee confusion gone — no one thought we were charging them.
  • Noticed the rewards below.
Still to fix
  • Referral felt complex.
  • Wanted recent transfers.
Testing plan
Story and spike backlog from testing
User testing board with findings
Users testing on their phones during the session
Testing plan
Story and spike backlog from testing
User testing board with findings
Users testing on their phones during the session
In short — It worked — and the leftover gaps became my clear next to-do list.
7Ship & measure

One clear screen. One clear number.

A single, honest "0 Fees"
No more scary comparison.
Live rate, up top
The number people came for.
Bold "Free" banner
Impossible to miss.
"90+ banks" trust line
Answers "is my money safe?"
A reason to return
Recent transfers for regulars.
Runs on CleverTap
Marketing swaps it, no dev time.
The final live screen — first-time vs. repeat user

The dashboard card went from the worst way into money transfer to the best.

Before, it was the least-used of three entry points. After the redesign, it became the single highest-performing touchpoint in the app.

★ The impact
+5.2%
more transfers started
+12K
extra senders / month
12→17%
Bangladesh conversion
100%
yearly goal hit (14.1% → 14.5%)

And I didn't stop there.

A 30-minute AI-made GIF test added another +3% in Pakistan. A quick input fix lifted Bangladesh from 12% to 17%. Small bets, real gains.

The headline +5.2% is from the full release — the new card and the live-rate / 0-fees view shipping together. These are separate wins on top.